The Wall Street Journal was out with an article on Monday stating that over 1,800 publicly traded banks would likely seek access to the Treasury Department’s rescue plan. While the total dollar figure being attached to the rescue plan is in excess of $700 billion, only $250 billion has been earmarked for bank recapitalizations. While this is a large sum, it is increasingly looking as if more money will be needed given the sheer number of banks that have not yet received government investments.
As we can see from the table below (via thestreet.com), nearly $170 billion has already been committed to supporting the institutions that control the majority of our banking system’s deposit base. However, this leaves only $80 billion in Treasury funds for the support of our country’s remaining 8,000 banks, most of which are private and state chartered. In other words, it’s going to get messy from here on out as the Bush administration will be forced to go back to Congress for more money, seriously reexamine the United States’ hybrid bank structure and be forced to develop an innovative method for delivering much needed capital to community banks. These community banks will prove difficult to deliver capital to because they are either too small or unwilling to become public, yet they nonetheless serve a vital part in the American economy and will need government capital in order to ensure the success of the Bush Administration's bank bailout. A simple division of the $80 billion dollars remaining among the 5,000 private and public banks likely to be working towards a government injection shows that they would on average receive a mere $16 million dollars, which is a surprisingly low figure and a cause for concern.
| Banks Receiving Government Investments | ||
| Bank | Ticker | Amount (in billions) |
| JPMorgan Chase | JPM | 25.000 |
| Bank of America* | BAC | 25.000 |
| Citigroup | C | 25.000 |
| Wells Fargo | WFC | 25.000 |
| Goldman Sachs | GS | 10.000 |
| Morgan Stanley | MS | 10.000 |
| PNC Financial Group | PNC | 7.700 |
| US Bancorp | USB | 6.600 |
| Capital One | COF | 3.550 |
| Regions Financial | RF | 3.500 |
| SunTrust | STI | 3.500 |
| Fifth Third | FITB | 3.400 |
| BB&T | BBT | 3.100 |
| Bank of New York Mellon | BK | 3.000 |
| KeyCorp | KEY | 2.500 |
| Comerica | CMA | 2.250 |
| State Street | STT | 2.000 |
| Marshall & Illsley | MI | 1.700 |
| Northern Trust | NTRS | 1.500 |
| Huntington Bancshares | HBAN | 1.400 |
| Zions | ZION | 1.400 |
| First Horizon | FHN | 0.866 |
| City National | CYN | 0.395 |
| Valley National | VLY | 0.330 |
| United Commercial | UCBH | 0.298 |
| Umpqua Holdings | UMPQ | 0.214 |
| Washington Federal | WFSL | 0.200 |
| First Niagra | FNFG | 0.186 |
| Old National | ONB | 0.150 |
| First Community | FCBC | 0.043 |
| HF Financial | HFFC | 0.025 |
| Redding Bank | BOCH | 0.017 |
| FFW Corp. | FFWC | 0.007 |
| Saigon National | SAGN | 0.001 |
| Provident** | PBKS | 0.000 |
| TOTAL | 169.832 | |
| Source: The Financial Services Roundtable, KBW *Includes Merrill Lynch **Hasn't decided to participate | ||
The government capital injections makes investing in banks difficult as it allows for an added variable that investors must take into account. Nevertheless, as the video below from Bloomberg discusses there are several metrics that can still be used by investors to gauge the risk of their bank investments. According to the commentator, tangible book value, normalized earnings and “excess” regulatory capital are all important characteristics that investors should be knowledgeable of when investing in banks. Even if his conclusions are poorly timed, the commentator does a nice job of laying out the framework needed for conducting bank investments.
As we saw in the forced National City sale, banks that have taken government capital should be viewed as having received a seal of approval from the government and can be considered by investors as safe havens in the financial sector and are more likely then not trading at once in a generation prices, regardless of the weakness in the economy going forward.
For Further Review:

0 comments:
Post a Comment